Development, validity, and utility of a model-based intrinsic capacity composite score in community-dwelling older persons
Yong‐Hao Pua · Laura Tay · Ross A. Clark · Julian Thumboo · Ee‐Ling Tay · Shi‐Min Mah · Xian Wang · Lim Jin Jin · Gary Kwok Kum Hoe · Yee Sien Ng
Journals of Gerontology Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To address the lack of a composite intrinsic capacity (IC) score based on the World Health Organization (WHO) Integrated Care for Older People (ICOPE) Screening tool, we propose a model-based approach to computing the composite score by developing and validating a model that uses the ICOPE screening items to predict the presence of impaired IC in community-dwelling older adults.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, a sample of 1235 participants (mean [SD], 68 [7] years) completed a multidomain geriatric and fitness assessment, from which we (1) operationalized the ICOPE Steps 1-2 screening/assessment and (2) derived a 5-point count-based Step 1 composite IC score and an 8-point Step 2 composite IC score. Proportional-odds regression analysis, leveraging on ICOPE screening items, was used to predict, for a given person, the probability that the Step 2 score was ≤6 points (impaired IC) and the corresponding mean score (model-based composite IC score).
RESULTS: The model c-statistic for impaired IC was 0.81 (95%CI, 0.79 to 0.86) and calibration was excellent. The model-based IC scores showed stronger discriminative validity than did the count-based scores for the prefrailty/frailty, sarcopenia, and restricted life-space-mobility outcomes (AUC differences, 0.05-0.12; p-values < .001). At a decision threshold of 20%, the model-based approach yielded greater net benefit (0.016), and it allowed a greater proportion of participants to potentially delay Step 2 assessment (n = 633 vs 317) without compromising positive and negative predictive values.
CONCLUSIONS: If externally validated, composite IC scores derived from the proposed model-based approach have the potential to facilitate more granular risk stratification and IC monitoring.
Abstract source ↗Cite this publication
Download Plain textCitation fields reflect the indexed metadata. Check author formatting and publication details against the source before submission.
Record provenance
Indexed record: W4414687194. Matched to Scopus author 55279534900.
Scopus record ↗Metadata retrieved 2026-09-20. Topic labels are navigation aids derived from title and abstract text.