← Clinical Evidence

SRC-fd12ba8b1758 Sebastia-Amat S 2026

Evidence source and scope

Sebastiá-Amat S, Tortosa-Martínez J, Manders RJF, Pueo B. Discriminative power of static posturography for identifying recurrent fallers in Parkinson’s disease patients. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2026;48:860–871 (online August 2025). DOI 10.1080/09638288.2025.2545598

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2025.2545598

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Sebastiá-Amat S, Tortosa-Martínez J, Manders RJF, Pueo B. Discriminative power of static posturography for identifying recurrent fallers in Parkinson’s disease patients. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2026;48:860–871 (online August 2025). DOI 10.1080/09638288.2025.2545598

Conditions: COND-PD Parkinson’s disease

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Parkinson’s disease — balance

Latest listed audit check, current for its stated components. Later recovery/refinement here supersedes earlier access limitations only where explicitly stated; it does not resolve unrelated source contradictions.

Complete final originalPDF independently supports revised balance P129–130,rowP172 and the final-paper parts ofP131. Methodspp862–865 confirms55recruited,2deaths/1uncontactable/1otherneurologic/3outliers->48;H&Y1–3,ON45–90min,monthlycallswithrelatives,FreeMed100Hz,shoulderwidth,armsides,1.5m target,three30sec trials/condition randomized,one-minute rest,mean. Table1confirms17recurrent31nonrecurrent. Screening by significanceandlargeeffect plus two backward models; sample-size targettwo-groupd=.8. Table4OR1.81(1.11–2.96)permm/s withhistory/HYandnonsignificantTUG;AUC.81(.70–.93),cut18.1. No sensitivity/specificity atcutoff,calibration,validation or clinical-only comparison. FinalResults explicitly says88.2%overallclassification; no integer numerator/48 produces88.2%at1decimal. Table4H&YOR4.96/CI2.90–9.28/SE.88/p.012 do not mutually reconcile;Table3RMSaxislabels reverseMethods. Source locator: archived source evidence pp862–869,Tables1–4 Limit: The earlier thesis has since been recovered: see the 2021 thesis source note for its 52 recruited, 48 analyzed and 91.7% classification account. Thesis and final-journal versions differ; no raw-data reconciliation or resolution of the final article’s internal inconsistencies is implied.

Earlier audit check 1 (historical evidence record). Its access limitations are superseded wherever the latest check above explicitly closes them. Retained for the distinct components and provenance, not as a current access statement.

Balance P129–131/P172: abstract confirms48(35men13women),1year,CoP speedEO,AUC.81,18.1mm/s cutoff,Youden,two-step logistic approach,history/HYselected,reported88.2%classification. 88.2% is not an integer fraction of48 at1decimal (42/48=87.5%,43/48=89.6%). Source locator: Official indexed abstract, archived source evidence Limit: Final-body55recruitment/exclusion flow,17events,monthlyrecall,protocol,OR1.81CI1.11–2.96,17EPV critiqueinputs,tableinconsistenciesand91.7%thesiscomparison are not independently reverified; thesisPDFattempt returnedHTML. Abstract supports reported88.2% but not reconciliation.

Limitations: Only scoped comparisons, not whole-paper certification.

Parkinson’s disease — balance1

Latest listed audit check, current for its stated components. Later recovery/refinement here supersedes earlier access limitations only where explicitly stated; it does not resolve unrelated source contradictions.

Complete final originalPDF independently supports revised balance P129–130,rowP172 and the final-paper parts ofP131. Methodspp862–865 confirms55recruited,2deaths/1uncontactable/1otherneurologic/3outliers->48;H&Y1–3,ON45–90min,monthlycallswithrelatives,FreeMed100Hz,shoulderwidth,armsides,1.5m target,three30sec trials/condition randomized,one-minute rest,mean. Table1confirms17recurrent31nonrecurrent. Screening by significanceandlargeeffect plus two backward models; sample-size targettwo-groupd=.8. Table4OR1.81(1.11–2.96)permm/s withhistory/HYandnonsignificantTUG;AUC.81(.70–.93),cut18.1. No sensitivity/specificity atcutoff,calibration,validation or clinical-only comparison. FinalResults explicitly says88.2%overallclassification; no integer numerator/48 produces88.2%at1decimal. Table4H&YOR4.96/CI2.90–9.28/SE.88/p.012 do not mutually reconcile;Table3RMSaxislabels reverseMethods. Source locator: archived source evidence pp862–869,Tables1–4 Limit: The earlier thesis has since been recovered: see the 2021 thesis source note for its 52 recruited, 48 analyzed and 91.7% classification account. Thesis and final-journal versions differ; no raw-data reconciliation or resolution of the final article’s internal inconsistencies is implied.

Earlier audit check 1 (historical evidence record). Its access limitations are superseded wherever the latest check above explicitly closes them. Retained for the distinct components and provenance, not as a current access statement.

Balance P129–131/P172: abstract confirms48(35men13women),1year,CoP speedEO,AUC.81,18.1mm/s cutoff,Youden,two-step logistic approach,history/HYselected,reported88.2%classification. 88.2% is not an integer fraction of48 at1decimal (42/48=87.5%,43/48=89.6%). Source locator: Official indexed abstract, archived source evidence Limit: Final-body55recruitment/exclusion flow,17events,monthlyrecall,protocol,OR1.81CI1.11–2.96,17EPV critiqueinputs,tableinconsistenciesand91.7%thesiscomparison are not independently reverified; thesisPDFattempt returnedHTML. Abstract supports reported88.2% but not reconciliation.

Limitations: Only scoped comparisons, not whole-paper certification.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide