SG-C02 · source arithmetic inconsistency
Classification and audit outcome: source arithmetic inconsistency; supported source discrepancy.
Finding
Current amendment or qualification
Wellmon et al. reported an MDC95 of 4.24 WGS points. However, their stated formula and SEM of 1.47 yield 1.96 × √2 × 1.47 = 4.075 points. Retain 4.24 only as a source-reported estimate and flag this discrepancy for clarification; neither number is a validated repeat-capture or patient-important threshold.
Remaining limitation: Preserve source-reported4.24 and recomputation separately; repeat-video ratings do not establish repeat-capture or patient-important change.
Evidence and provenance
audit evidence record E010–022,E028–030; Table2
- Wellmon R, Degano A, Rubertone JA, Campbell S, Russo KA. Interrater and intrarater reliability and minimal detectable change of the Wisconsin Gait Scale when used to examine videotaped gait in individuals post-stroke. Archives of physiotherapy. 2015;5:11. DOI 10.1186/s40945-015-0011-z · Original source
Affected reports
Original audit locator(s): table 2, row 11; paragraph 84; table 6, row 16
Audit corrections describe the report only where that classification is explicit. A disagreement within a study, missing protocol, statistical query, access upgrade or optional addition is not silently converted into a report error or a new clinical threshold.
Audit register · Unresolved evidence queue
Linked knowledge pages
- COND-STROKE Stroke
- TEST-WGS Wisconsin Gait Scale
Located in this vault
- Gait assessment and prognosis after stroke: P0125, P0126, P0127, P0128, P0129, P0199, P0407, P0408, P0409, P0410
Mapping status: exact. An exact location match is not an additional empirical verification.