Felius RAW, Geerars M, Bruijn SM, van Dieën JH, Wouda NC, Punt M. Reliability of IMU-Based Gait Assessment in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;22(3). DOI 10.3390/s22030908
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
DOI: 10.3390/s22030908
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
Felius RAW, Geerars M, Bruijn SM, van Dieën JH, Wouda NC, Punt M. Reliability of IMU-Based Gait Assessment in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2022;22(3). DOI 10.3390/s22030908 Source examined: Full text.
Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Stroke gait — gait
- current access statement: Current audit access: full_body. Prior claims of licensed reading are not re-certified merely from present availability.
- source access: full_body
Methods confirm 31 recruited and two excluded, two centres, minimum 0.05 m/s, a two-minute foot/back IMU protocol with 24-hour retest, and 25-stride complexity estimates. Many temporal features were reproducible; entropy/local divergence were poorer.
Source locator: audit evidence record E008–023,E026–040; AppendixA
Limitations: The demographics table sums to 30 despite 31 recruited and two exclusions. The report says 31 recruited correctly. Meaningful change is untested and exact cross-publication overlap remains unresolved.
Reports citing this source
- Gait assessment and prognosis after stroke · reference 47 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide