Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test in people with non-specific chronic low back pain-a cross-sectional test-retest reliability study.
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-022-03223-3
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
Özüdoğru A, Canlı M, Ceylan İ, Kuzu Ş, Alkan H, Karaçay BÇ. Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test in people with non-specific chronic low back pain-a cross-sectional test-retest reliability study. Irish journal of medical science. 2023;192(4):1903-1908. DOI 10.1007/s11845-022-03223-3 Source examined: Original abstract; repository manuscript unavailable without login.
Conditions: COND-LBP Low back pain
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Low back pain
- current evidence level: fulltext_text
Source locator: Original repository PDF Methods pp 2–3; Tables 1–4 pp 3–4
Limitations: Ambiguous/nonstandard SEM input, not a proven arithmetic transcription error: score SD yields about .49 s SEM and 1.36 s MDC; difference SD yields .05/.139. Neither reconstruction is an endorsed clinical threshold. Inclusion age 18–65 conflicts with table maximum 67.
Low back pain
- verification level: fulltext_text
Original Tables 2–3 confirm 40 analysed, score SD 4.9 s, ICC .99, SEM .05 s and MDC .13 s. The last two reproduce approximately using difference-score SD .5 rather than score SD 4.9. The paper gives SEM=SD×sqrt(1−ICC) without identifying the SD. Reported ICC matches; individual thresholds require clarification.
Source locator: Original repository PDF Methods pp 2–3; Tables 1–4 pp 3–4
Limitations: Ambiguous/nonstandard SEM input, not a proven arithmetic transcription error: score SD yields about .49 s SEM and 1.36 s MDC; difference SD yields .05/.139. Neither reconstruction is an endorsed clinical threshold. Inclusion age 18–65 conflicts with table maximum 67.
Linked audit findings
Reports citing this source
- Sit to stand assessment and prognosis in low back pain · reference 21 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide
Linked knowledge pages
- TEST-5STS Five times sit to stand