← Clinical Evidence

SRC-e09bcd3da8a6 Chopp-Hurley JN 2019

Evidence source and scope

Investigating the Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry for Measuring Knee Strength in Older Women with Knee Osteoarthritis.

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2018-0051

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Chopp-Hurley JN, Wiebenga EG, Gatti AA, Maly MR. Investigating the Test-Retest Reliability and Validity of Hand-Held Dynamometry for Measuring Knee Strength in Older Women with Knee Osteoarthritis. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada. 2019;71(3):231-238. DOI 10.3138/ptc-2018-0051 Source examined: Complete official PMC HTML including tables.

Conditions: COND-KOA Knee osteoarthritis

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis — strength

Methods, Table 2 and agreement results confirm fixed HHD testing, same-day design, 99% ICC intervals and quoted MDCs. The 17.1 Nm extension discrepancy and wide cross-device interval support the non-interchangeability warning.

Source locator: Methods;Table2;agreementResults

Limitations: Source-group appraisal. A supported source group does not turn every generic clinical recommendation into a validated decision rule.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide