← Clinical Evidence

SRC-da91572d7a6e Duncan RP 2012

Evidence source and scope

Duncan RP, Leddy AL, Cavanaugh JT, et al. Accuracy of fall prediction in Parkinson disease: six-month and 12-month prospective analyses. Parkinson's Disease. 2012. DOI 10.1155/2012/237673

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1155/2012/237673

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Duncan RP, Leddy AL, Cavanaugh JT, et al. Accuracy of fall prediction in Parkinson disease: six-month and 12-month prospective analyses. Parkinson's Disease. 2012. DOI 10.1155/2012/237673

Conditions: COND-PD Parkinson’s disease

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Parkinson’s disease — balance

Balance P59/P94–96: 80 baseline, 51/40 retained,14/13 recurrent fallers; six-month recall; seven of 11 later dropouts recurrent fallers; Mini32 and ON state confirmed. AUC .89/.87 at6months and .68/.77 at12months are confirmed in companion same-cohort original Table3. Source locator: s2–9 Methods/Results; Duncan2013 Table3 image Limit: No external validation; claim comparison limited to listed paragraphs.

Limitations: Only scoped comparisons, not whole-paper certification.

Parkinson’s disease — balance1

Balance P59/P94–96: 80 baseline, 51/40 retained,14/13 recurrent fallers; six-month recall; seven of 11 later dropouts recurrent fallers; Mini32 and ON state confirmed. AUC .89/.87 at6months and .68/.77 at12months are confirmed in companion same-cohort original Table3. Source locator: s2–9 Methods/Results; Duncan2013 Table3 image Limit: No external validation; claim comparison limited to listed paragraphs.

Limitations: Only scoped comparisons, not whole-paper certification.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide