Reliability of the Handgrip Strength Test in Elderly Subjects With Parkinson Disease.
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
Villafañe JH, Valdes K, Buraschi R, Martinelli M, Bissolotti L, Negrini S. Reliability of the Handgrip Strength Test in Elderly Subjects With Parkinson Disease. Hand (N Y). 2016;11(1):54–8. DOI 10.1177/1558944715614852
Conditions: COND-PD Parkinson’s disease
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Parkinson’s disease — strength
- access status: full_main_text_available
STR-03-05
STR-03-01
STR-03-02
STR-03-03
STR-03-04
Limitations: Only current scoped checks; archived captures not authenticated against live originals.
Parkinson’s disease strength
- current access: full_main_text_available
- primary version: PMC full article; version not independently compared to publisher PDF
Parkinson’s disease strength component — Entire Jamar protocol bundle
Methods confirms every listed positioning, familiarization, effort, rest and scoring detail: seated Jamar handle 2, three pain-free three-second trials per hand, mean score, one-week retest, morning testing and usual medication without dyskinesia.
Source locator: Methods Participants and Procedure
Limitations: AI-assisted source comparison; no raw-data verification.
Parkinson’s disease strength component — ICCs and SEM incompatibility
Table 2 gives ICCs .97 and .98, SDs 10.2 and 10.3 kg, and SEM .05 kg. The stated formula instead yields 1.7667 and 1.4566 kg. The report correctly flags a source inconsistency; raw data remain unavailable.
Source locator: Data Analysis, Table 2; audit evidence record
Limitations: AI-assisted source comparison; no raw-data verification.
Parkinson’s disease strength component — Source true-change rule and inconsistent signed differences
Discussion proposes ±.092 kg using two SEMs. Table 2 mixes opposite sign conventions for dominant and nondominant changes. These details match the report, and two SEMs is not conventional two-score MDC 95.
Source locator: Table 2 and Discussion
Limitations: Figure inspected in STR-03-04; historical erratum search cannot be reproduced, new bounded search in STR-03-05. AI-assisted source comparison; no raw-data verification.
Parkinson’s disease strength component — Grip agreement figure inspection
Figure 1 uses right/left rather than dominance labels and shows many points beyond the plotted purported 95% limits, including differences around−5.5 and−6.8 kg. The report's visual caution is supported.
Source locator: PMC Figure 1; audit evidence record
Limitations: A new erratum search has not established the historical 2 October claim. AI-assisted source comparison; no raw-data verification.
Parkinson’s disease strength component — Bounded correction search
A new exact-DOI erratum/correction search identified no correction. This bounded negative search cannot prove absence or recreate the report's historical 2 October search.
Source locator: Web search 3 October 2026 and primarymetadata
Limitations: AI-assisted source comparison; no raw-data verification.
Reports citing this source
- Strength muscle power and rapid force production assessment in Parkinson’s disease · reference 3 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide