← Clinical Evidence

SRC-c5c63e3d772c de Vet HCW 2006

Evidence source and scope

When to use agreement versus reliability measures.

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

de Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–1039. DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.10.015

Conditions: COND-PD Parkinson’s disease

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Parkinson’s disease — strength

STR-46-01

Limitations: Only current scoped checks; archived captures not authenticated against live originals.

Parkinson’s disease strength

Parkinson’s disease strength component — Reliability depends on heterogeneity; agreement measures individual error

Primary abstract explicitly distinguishes rank reliability and measurement agreement and describes between-person variation dependence. Detailed model prescriptions and formulas go beyond the abstract.

Source locator: Primary abstract

Limitations: AI-assisted source comparison; no raw-data verification.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide