← Clinical Evidence

SRC-aca0fe42610a Marsan T 2026

Evidence source and scope

Marsan T, Clauzade S, Zhang X, Grandin N, Urman T, Linton E, et al. REEV SENSE IMUs for Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation Against Optical Motion Capture. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2026;26(2). DOI 10.3390/s26020667

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.3390/s26020667

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Marsan T, Clauzade S, Zhang X, Grandin N, Urman T, Linton E, et al. REEV SENSE IMUs for Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis in Post-Stroke Patients: Validation Against Optical Motion Capture. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2026;26(2). DOI 10.3390/s26020667 Source examined: Full text.

Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Stroke gait — gait

Methods and Results confirm 20 enrolled and 14 analysed after excluding six slow walkers, including all walker users. Temporal agreement is stronger than spatial agreement, but differences beyond ±1.96 SD were removed before final accuracy analyses.

Source locator: audit evidence record E039,E045,E054–066; Tables2–4

Limitations: The study trims differences outside ±1.96 SD before final analysis. This can bias retained measurement-error estimates downward. Describing trimming as standard Bland–Altman methodology is misleading.

Linked audit findings

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide

Linked knowledge pages