Assessment of sit-to-stand movement in nonspecific low back pain: a comparison study for psychometric properties of field-based and laboratory-based methods.
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
DOI: 10.1097/mrr.0000000000000164
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
Kahraman T, Ozcan Kahraman B, Salik Sengul Y, Kalemci O. Assessment of sit-to-stand movement in nonspecific low back pain: a comparison study for psychometric properties of field-based and laboratory-based methods. International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation. 2016;39(2):165-70. DOI 10.1097/mrr.0000000000000164 Source examined: Original abstract or bibliographic record only; complete numerical tables unavailable.
Conditions: COND-LBP Low back pain
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Low back pain
- current evidence level: abstract
Source locator: Original abstract; review Table 2 for sample
Limitations: 38-person sample is review-derived; full error tables remain unavailable.
Low back pain
- verification level: abstract
48–72-hour retest, 30 CST ICC .94 versus platform .62–.69 supported.
Source locator: Original abstract; review Table 2 for sample
Limitations: 38-person sample is review-derived; full error tables remain unavailable.
Reports citing this source
- Sit to stand assessment and prognosis in low back pain · reference 14 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide