← Clinical Evidence

SRC-a19dae1b0d0a Fiems CL 2020

Evidence source and scope

Fiems CL, Miller SA, Buchanan N, Knowles E, Larson E, Snow R, Moore ES. Does a Sway-Based Mobile Application Predict Future Falls in People With Parkinson Disease? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020;101:472–478 (online October 2019). DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.013

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.013

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Fiems CL, Miller SA, Buchanan N, Knowles E, Larson E, Snow R, Moore ES. Does a Sway-Based Mobile Application Predict Future Falls in People With Parkinson Disease? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2020;101:472–478 (online October 2019). DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.09.013

Conditions: COND-PD Parkinson’s disease

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Parkinson’s disease — balance

Latest listed audit check, current for its stated components. Later recovery/refinement here supersedes earlier access limitations only where explicitly stated; it does not resolve unrelated source contradictions.

Primary publisher Participants/Results/Discussion excerpts independently confirm 68 recruited, six scheduling exclusions, three age-ineligible, 59 enrolled, H&Y 1–4, 26 prior recurrent fallers and mCTSIB Sway protocol. Original abstract supports six-month prospective ascertainment and reported AUC/model findings. This verifies the report’s carefully limited assertions; future-event count and complete article remain unavailable. These are publisher excerpts, not a retrieved complete body. Source locator: audit evidence record, ScienceDirect Participants/Results/Discussion; official indexed abstract Limit: Complete body and future-event count unavailable; no claim that the report’s detailed mCTSIB administration was verified because it does not supply it.

Earlier audit check 1 (historical evidence record). Its access limitations are superseded wherever the latest check above explicitly closes them. Retained for the distinct components and provenance, not as a current access statement.

Balance P141–143/P178;olderP128–129/P161: primaryabstractconfirms59,HYI–III,6monthsprospectivefuturefallsdespitecross-sectionallabel,SwayAUC.65ABC.76Mini.72,selectedmodelhistory/ABC/SwayonlyhistoryandABCsignificant;85% is percentfallersclassified notoverallaccuracy. Source locator: Official PubMed abstract https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31669299/ and cachedpublisherabstract Limit: The report's further publisher-excerpt facts(mCTSIB,68agreed,6scheduling3ageexclusions,HYI–IVbody,26priorrecurrent) were not independently recovered. No evidence oferror, but thoseclausesremainunverified. Earlier85%classificationphrase needsqualification.

Limitations: Only scoped comparisons, not whole-paper certification.

Parkinson’s disease — balance1

Latest listed audit check, current for its stated components. Later recovery/refinement here supersedes earlier access limitations only where explicitly stated; it does not resolve unrelated source contradictions.

Primary publisher Participants/Results/Discussion excerpts independently confirm 68 recruited, six scheduling exclusions, three age-ineligible, 59 enrolled, H&Y 1–4, 26 prior recurrent fallers and mCTSIB Sway protocol. Original abstract supports six-month prospective ascertainment and reported AUC/model findings. This verifies the report’s carefully limited assertions; future-event count and complete article remain unavailable. These are publisher excerpts, not a retrieved complete body. Source locator: audit evidence record, ScienceDirect Participants/Results/Discussion; official indexed abstract Limit: Complete body and future-event count unavailable; no claim that the report’s detailed mCTSIB administration was verified because it does not supply it.

Earlier audit check 1 (historical evidence record). Its access limitations are superseded wherever the latest check above explicitly closes them. Retained for the distinct components and provenance, not as a current access statement.

Balance P141–143/P178;olderP128–129/P161: primaryabstractconfirms59,HYI–III,6monthsprospectivefuturefallsdespitecross-sectionallabel,SwayAUC.65ABC.76Mini.72,selectedmodelhistory/ABC/SwayonlyhistoryandABCsignificant;85% is percentfallersclassified notoverallaccuracy. Source locator: Official PubMed abstract https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31669299/ and cachedpublisherabstract Limit: The report's further publisher-excerpt facts(mCTSIB,68agreed,6scheduling3ageexclusions,HYI–IVbody,26priorrecurrent) were not independently recovered. No evidence oferror, but thoseclausesremainunverified. Earlier85%classificationphrase needsqualification.

Limitations: Only scoped comparisons, not whole-paper certification.

Linked audit findings

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide