← Clinical Evidence

SRC-7b953768ff3d Kim J 2026

Evidence source and scope

Kim J.S. Incremental predictive value of spatiotemporal gait parameters beyond clinical measures for achieving independent outdoor ambulation in subacute stroke patients: A retrospective cohort study. Gait and Posture. 2026. DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110264

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110264

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Kim J.S. Incremental predictive value of spatiotemporal gait parameters beyond clinical measures for achieving independent outdoor ambulation in subacute stroke patients: A retrospective cohort study. Gait and Posture. 2026. DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2026.110264 Source examined: Complete licensed publisher HTML text; main methods and four tables examined; supplements/code not separately appraised.

Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Stroke gait — gait

The original confirms 137 complete cases, 89/48 outcomes, 4–14 weeks, within 7 admissiondays, at least 3 comfortablepasses;AIC forward selection and added support parameters;AUC 0.995→0.998, LRp 0.009, DeLongp 0.262, correctedAUC 0.994/0.996, andBrier 0.029/0.016. Table 3 confirms nonsignificant unpenalized support coefficients and the double-support sign reversal.

Source locator: audit evidence record p0050–p0085 (Methods), p0090–p0130 (Results), p0165–p0175 (limitations); audit evidence record Tables1–4 and Figure1 caption; original HTML in audit evidence record

Limitations: Main Methods specify 1000 bootstrap resamples and out-of-bag predictions but do not establish that all screening and selection were repeated inside each resample. Figure 1 explicitly describes calibration in the analysis cohort. Supplements and code were not separately appraised. The report’s cautious interpretation and baseline-FAC comparator criticism are supported.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide