← Clinical Evidence

SRC-7b2639fb3de4 Butsara Chinsongkram 2014

Evidence source and scope

Butsara Chinsongkram, Nithinun Chaikeeree, Vitoon Saengsirisuwan, Nitaya Viriyatharakij, Fay B Horak, Rumpa Boonsinsukh. Reliability and validity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Physical therapy. 2014. DOI 10.2522/ptj.20130558

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20130558

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Butsara Chinsongkram, Nithinun Chaikeeree, Vitoon Saengsirisuwan, Nitaya Viriyatharakij, Fay B Horak, Rumpa Boonsinsukh. Reliability and validity of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) in people with subacute stroke. Physical therapy. 2014. DOI 10.2522/ptj.20130558 Source examined: Complete licensed original article PDF examined, including main tables; key table visually checked. Average-rating video rescoring, not patient test–retest; no original MDC. Current Fugl-Meyer motor-group classification, not prognosis. Printed Mini/BBS negative likelihood ratios conflict with corresponding sensitivity/specificity.

Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Stroke

Prasart:12 video reliability/70 validity,35 low/35 high total FMA, under 4 months, MMSE≥24, aphasiaexcluded, no diagnosedneglect/pushing. Five raters,2 workshops,7 day rescoring; ICC 2, k/3, k .99. Shared tasks scoredonce;90 min total. Mini floor 12/35=34.3%; near-ceiling BBS 45.7%/PASS 60%. BESTest>49%AUC.88(CI.80–.95); Mini/BBS.85 current FMAclassification. Table 3 negative LRs inconsistent:Mini(.286/.857)≈.334 versusprinted.21; BBS(.143/.686)≈.208 versusprinted.33.

Source locator: Participants/Reliability/Validity; Results; Tables 2–3

Limitations: No reanalysis of participant data. Cross-paper independence cannot be inferred from matching n 12/n 70; source sites and FMA grouping differ.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide

Linked knowledge pages