David Jagroop, Raabeae Aryan, Alison Schinkel-Ivy, Avril Mansfield. Reliability of unconventional centre of pressure measures of quiet standing balance in people with chronic stroke. Gait & posture. 2023. DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.03.021
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.03.021
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
David Jagroop, Raabeae Aryan, Alison Schinkel-Ivy, Avril Mansfield. Reliability of unconventional centre of pressure measures of quiet standing balance in people with chronic stroke. Gait & posture. 2023. DOI 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.03.021 Source examined: Abstract/metadata verified; full text not retrieved.
Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Stroke
20 chronic participants from reactive-balance trial, also required unaided 10 m walking; two 30 s trials~2 min apart,250 Hz,10 Hz filter. Report faithfully repeats ICC 3,2 range.79–.95 and single-trial symmetry/synchrony<.75. Full manuscript recommends 3–6 averaged trials for clinical ICC≥.9, not a generally sufficient two-trial rule. Table 2 synchrony ICC 3,1=.62 and ICC 3,2=.83 appear inconsistent with the standard average-measure relation 2 r/(1+r) (~.765), assuming identical participants, paired trials and variance components. Methods describes the same 20-person two-trial dataset and both coefficients from one SAS macro; no separate estimation sample is reported.
Source locator: Manuscript pp 3–6; Methods; Table 2
Limitations: Repository version may differ from final publisher article; source labels not assumed equivalent. Table caption also says three trials although Methods/Table show two. No trial averaging protocol prospectively validated. This is a request for clarification, not a confirmed calculation error; different unreported data or variance estimation could alter the comparison.
Reports citing this source
- Standing balance assessment and prognosis after stroke · reference 31 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide
Linked knowledge pages
- TEST-COP Force plate posturography and centre of pressure