← Clinical Evidence

SRC-694e3138fe03 David Gasq 2014

Evidence source and scope

David Gasq, Marc Labrunée, David Amarantini, Philippe Dupui, Richard Montoya, Philippe Marque. Between-day reliability of centre of pressure measures for balance assessment in hemiplegic stroke patients. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2014. DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-39

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-39

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

David Gasq, Marc Labrunée, David Amarantini, Philippe Dupui, Richard Montoya, Philippe Marque. Between-day reliability of centre of pressure measures for balance assessment in hemiplegic stroke patients. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation. 2014. DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-11-39 Source examined: Full article body and tables examined via Europe PMC.

Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Stroke

20 participants,≥1 month, mean 10.3 months/range 1–37; stand 5 min. Barefoot heels 3 cm/toeout 30°,3×51.2 s per condition,1 min rests,7 day same-time repeat,40 Hz. Mean 3. EO/EC velocity ICC .94/.97, SEM 2.1/3.2 and SRD 6.1/9.5 mm/s. Area ICC .76 EO, SRD ratios 3.68 EO/2.16 EC; MLposition ICC .78/.71. Student t=2.093 used for SRD, explaining difference from universal 1.96 multiplier. Discussion explicitly states net ML COP combines weight distribution and reaction-force point of application; two plates better isolate loading.

Source locator: Methods Participants/Experimental design/Data processing/Data analysis; Table 2; Discussion Level of agreement with ICC

Limitations: Small selected mixed-phase sample; individual raw data not independently reanalysed.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide