← Clinical Evidence

SRC-51f799063cb8 Bruyneel 2021

Evidence source and scope

Bruyneel, Anne-Violette, Dubé, François. Best Quantitative Tools for Assessing Static and Dynamic Standing Balance after Stroke: A Systematic Review. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada. 2021. DOI 10.3138/ptc-2020-0005

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.3138/ptc-2020-0005

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Bruyneel, Anne-Violette, Dubé, François. Best Quantitative Tools for Assessing Static and Dynamic Standing Balance after Stroke: A Systematic Review. Physiotherapy Canada. Physiotherapie Canada. 2021. DOI 10.3138/ptc-2020-0005 Source examined: Full text read on public PMC page.

Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Stroke

Review of 22 studies and 18 quantitative tools reports generally good/excellent reliability, inconsistent validity and variable methodological reporting. Most tests required independent walking or good standing capacity. Clinical utility explicitly includes cost, time, training and portability. Comparison with observational scales is not proof of interchangeability.

Source locator: Results reliability, validity, clinical utility; Discussion

Limitations: This review maps prior evidence; it does not establish validity for every device, metric or severely impaired subgroup.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide