Reliability and responsiveness of the shuttle walking test in patients with chronic low back pain.
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
DOI: 10.1002/pri.225
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
Taylor S, Frost H, Taylor A, Barker K. Reliability and responsiveness of the shuttle walking test in patients with chronic low back pain. Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy. 2001;6(3):170-8. DOI 10.1002/pri.225 Source examined: Original abstract or bibliographic record only; complete numerical tables unavailable.
Conditions: COND-LBP Low back pain
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Low back pain
- current evidence level: abstract
Source locator: Original abstract Results
Limitations: Full text unavailable. Report labels the 49.5 m figure secondary although original abstract independently supports its calculation.
Low back pain
- verification level: abstract
44 reliability participants; ICC .99 and LoA−47 to 52 m around 2.5 m bias (half-width 49.5 m). Responsiveness uses standardized effect size, not a patient anchor.
Source locator: Original abstract Results
Limitations: Full text unavailable. Report labels the 49.5 m figure secondary although original abstract independently supports its calculation.
Linked audit findings
Reports citing this source
- Gait assessment and prognosis in low back pain · reference 6 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide