← Clinical Evidence

SRC-488ad489687f De Leo D 2026

Evidence source and scope

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Timed Up and Go Test, 10-Meter Walk Test, and 2-Minute Walk Test in Patients in the Acute Phase After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2026.06.062

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

De Leo D, Temporiti F, Guzzetti L, Crimeni E, Grappiolo G, Gatti R. Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Timed Up and Go Test, 10-Meter Walk Test, and 2-Minute Walk Test in Patients in the Acute Phase After Total Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of arthroplasty. 2026. DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2026.06.062 Source examined: Original abstract only; full article not retrieved.

Conditions: COND-THA Total hip arthroplasty

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Total hip arthroplasty

100 inpatients, days 1/3, 15-point change anchor. MCID ranges TUG3.7–9.0 s, 10 MWT .06–.25 m/s, 2 MWT3.3–33.5 m. AUC TUG .73(CI .62–.82), walk .64/.55.

Source locator: Pub Med PMID42373020 Methods/Results

Limitations: Exact anchor grouping, chosen thresholds/correlations and protocol remain unresolved; report correctly avoids one universal number. No usable body obtained through checked lawful routes; not proof that no lawful copy exists.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide

Linked knowledge pages