← Clinical Evidence

SRC-3899c92ce557 Vincent HK 2014

Evidence source and scope

Back strength predicts walking improvement in obese, older adults with chronic low back pain.

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.11.002

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Vincent HK, Vincent KR, Seay AN, Conrad BP, Hurley RW, George SZ. Back strength predicts walking improvement in obese, older adults with chronic low back pain. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 2014;6(5):418-26. DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.11.002 Source examined: Original abstract or metadata only; no original full-text numerical table validation.

Vincent HK, Vincent KR, Seay AN, Conrad BP, Hurley RW, George SZ. Back strength predicts walking improvement in obese, older adults with chronic low back pain. PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. 2014;6(5):418-26. DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.11.002 Source examined: Original abstract or bibliographic record only; complete numerical tables unavailable.

Conditions: COND-LBP Low back pain

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Low back pain

Source locator: PMC full body Methods/Results/Tables; two sequential pages

Limitations: Full source obtained.49 is analysis/completer sample;72 consented,7 failed screening and additional follow-up loss. Report numerical associations match but cohort flow should be made explicit.

Low back pain

49 obese older adults 60–85, four-month randomized exercise context; endurance between-group P=.11, gait P<.05, strength change explained 10.6% of endurance change. Report correctly distinguishes change–change association from baseline prognosis.

Source locator: PMC full body Methods/Results/Tables; two sequential pages

Limitations: Full source obtained. The 49 participants are the analysis/completer sample; 72 consented, 7 failed screening, and there was additional attrition. The reports do not explicitly describe 49 as enrolled. LBP06 is a denominator clarification, not a definite report error.

Linked audit findings

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide