← Clinical Evidence

SRC-234b35cef847 Alammari BJ 2025

Evidence source and scope

Alammari BJ, Schoenwether B, Ripic Z, Kirk-Sanchez N, Eltoukhy M, Bishop L. Validity of AI-Driven Markerless Motion Capture for Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis in Stroke Survivors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;25(17). DOI 10.3390/s25175315

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.3390/s25175315

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Alammari BJ, Schoenwether B, Ripic Z, Kirk-Sanchez N, Eltoukhy M, Bishop L. Validity of AI-Driven Markerless Motion Capture for Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis in Stroke Survivors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2025;25(17). DOI 10.3390/s25175315 Source examined: Full text.

Conditions: COND-STROKE Stroke

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Stroke gait — gait

Methods and Tables 1–3 confirm 19 survivors, eight-camera KinaTrax versus Zeno, one matched cycle per trial, comfortable speed limits ±0.03 m/s and paretic single-support ICC 0.314. Stride width agreement is poor.

Source locator: audit evidence record E009–025; Tables1–3 E037–039

Limitations: The statistical text mixes average-rating and single-measure wording. Reported results remain parameter-specific; between-day, home-use and prognostic validity are not established.

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide

Linked knowledge pages