Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty.
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
Graber J, Kittelson A, Juarez-Colunga E, Jin X, Bade M, Stevens-Lapsley J. Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. 2022;29(11):1899-1907. DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocac123 Source examined: Abstract/metadata verified; full article unavailable.
Conditions: COND-TKA Total knee arthroplasty
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Total knee arthroplasty
- access status: public_primary_body_read
Public complete primary body. Neighbors-based versus mixed-model comparison,317 training/456 testing records, postoperative inputs and geographic/methodological test separation checked. Supplement not separately inspected.
Source locator: Materials and Methods; Results; Limitations
Limitations: Availability of the article body does not imply all unquoted tables, figures or supplementary analyses were verified. Article access does not prove every table/figure/supplement was examined. Use the claim ledger and explicit source locators; do not count this inventory as a complete assertion-level audit.
Reports citing this source
- Gait assessment and prognosis after total knee arthroplasty · reference 24 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide