Group differences and associations between patient-reported outcomes and physical characteristics in chronic low back pain patients and healthy controls.
This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106009
Bibliographic record from the original reports
Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.
Schilaty N, Bates N, Holmes B, Nagai T. Group differences and associations between patient-reported outcomes and physical characteristics in chronic low back pain patients and healthy controls. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon). 2023;106:106009. DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106009 Source examined: Original abstract or metadata only; no original full-text numerical table validation.
Conditions: COND-LBP Low back pain
Scoped audit evidence
These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.
Low back pain
- current evidence level: fulltext
Source locator: Methods 2.1–2.6 pp 2–4; Results and Tables 2–5
Limitations: Small cross-sectional cohort; retain restricted inference. Public Duke repository PDF carries personal-use notice and is excluded from shared deliverables. Original Results show CSI–jerk rs .446, P .072 and CSI–path rs .449, P .071, so the abstract correlation range is not uniformly significant. The reports do not repeat that overgeneralization.
Low back pain
- verification level: fulltext
18 CLBP/15 controls, one 90-minute visit. OpalIMUs 128 Hz lumbar/feet,3×30 sec balance and 3 comfortable walks; dynamometer 25°isometric trunk battery. Demographic/design/protocol and concurrent association interpretation match report. No longitudinal prognosis or phone-derived force.
Source locator: Methods 2.1–2.6 pp 2–4; Results and Tables 2–5
Limitations: Small cross-sectional cohort; retain restricted inference. Public Duke repository PDF carries personal-use notice and is excluded from shared deliverables. Original Results show CSI–jerk rs .446, P .072 and CSI–path rs .449, P .071, so the abstract correlation range is not uniformly significant. The reports do not repeat that overgeneralization.
Reports citing this source
- Strength power and rapid force assessment in low back pain · reference 16 · original reference
- Standing balance assessment and prognosis in low back pain · reference 27 · original reference
Update record
- 2026-10-03: Created from the supplied reports and final scoped audit. New evidence should be appended with source version, access date, exact locator and affected report links.
Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide