← Clinical Evidence

SRC-0985a6d897e9 Unver B 2017

Evidence source and scope

Reliability of 4-meter and 10-meter walk tests after lower extremity surgery.

This note indexes a cited or audit-added source. It may be an original study, review, guideline, form or methods reference. Treat the specific design and the evidence below as authoritative; a source note is not automatically a primary study.

DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236153

Bibliographic record from the original reports

Access labels embedded in these original reference strings are historical. Current access and exact checked components are stated separately below.

Unver B, Baris RH, Yuksel E, Cekmece S, Kalkan S, Karatosun V. Reliability of 4-meter and 10-meter walk tests after lower extremity surgery. Disability and rehabilitation. 2017;39(25):2572-2576. DOI 10.1080/09638288.2016.1236153 Source examined: Abstract verified; mixed lower-extremity surgery, original subgroup table not retrieved.

Conditions: COND-TKA Total knee arthroplasty

Scoped audit evidence

These are source- and component-level audit summaries as of 3 October 2026. Access and comparison scope can differ by report; none certifies every result or the underlying raw data.

Total knee arthroplasty

Full author-posted journal PDF.47 TKA and19 THA among102; postoperative days3–4. TKA/THA subgroup estimates exist. Several SEM/SRD pairs fail to reproduce under printed formula; no deployment endorsement.

Source locator: Methods pp2573–2574; Tables2–3 p2574; Discussion p2575

Limitations: Original copy inspected for the specified claims. Access does not itself validate clinical extrapolation. Article access does not prove every table/figure/supplement was examined. Use the claim ledger and explicit source locators; do not count this inventory as a complete assertion-level audit.

Total hip arthroplasty

Among 102 surgical inpatients, 19 had THA. Testing was on postoperative day 3 or 4, twice on the same day by one examiner, with rest as needed. Fast walking used the central 4 m of an 8 m path and central 10 m of a 20 m path; all patients used walkers or crutches. THA Table 2: 4 MWT ICC 0.97 (0.93–0.99), SEM 1.2 s, reported SRD95 3.6 s. THA Table 3: 10 MWT ICC 0.96 (0.91–0.98), SEM 3.5 s, reported SRD95 9.7 s. These are elapsed-time errors, not m/s. The 4 MWT SRD does not reconcile with the displayed SEM under the stated formula; the THA 10 MWT value does.

Source locator: Original author-posted journal PDF: Methods/Measurements and Statistical analysis p 2573; Tables 2–3 p 2574 (PDF page 4 visually inspected); Discussion p 2575

Limitations: New supplemental evidence, not a correction of an originally cited THA source. Mixed surgery cohort; THA indication, approach and subgroup weight-bearing restrictions are not sufficiently specified for primary elective OA transport. Small THA subgroup and same-day design. THA 4 MWT SRD computation remains unresolved; source also alternates 1.95 and 1.96 and has a pooled 10 MWT SEM/SRD inconsistency. No patient-valued MIC or between-day deployment threshold established. Substantive original material obtained; this is not proof of original report author access or every table/supplement being inspected.

Targeted evidence additions

Scope: new audit supplemental evidence; not cited or named in any of the four original THA reports

These additions came from bounded source tracing, not a systematic update proving complete literature coverage.

Linked audit findings

Reports citing this source

Update record

Updating the wiki · Evidence and status guide

Linked knowledge pages