Aily exact gait claim closures
The recovered original article, official supplement and Figure 2 close access gaps for these eleven named earlier gait units. This does not close unrelated knee-OA gaps or resolve the source’s numerical conflicts. The BMI criterion is verified separately from its qualitative obesity-context clause.
gait-B020-S03
Original report claim: Aily's original supplementary eligibility criteria excluded BMI at least 30 kg/m², despite obesity being common in knee OA.
Current scoped check: The original explicitly excludes BMI ≥30 kg/m². The wider contextual claim about obesity being common in knee OA is not established by this eligibility table and has not been re-estimated here.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified Aily component contextual clause not reestimated.
Source locator: Supplement Table 1, PDF page 1; rendered page visually inspected
Source numerical conflicts retained: not identified for this specific unit.
Report locations: P0021
^gait-b020-s03
gait-B066-S01
Original report claim: Aily and colleagues compared video-guided and face-to-face OARSI testing in 32 people with KL 2–3 OA.
Current scoped check: The source has 32 participants: 22 with KL II and 10 with KL III. OARSI tasks were compared during separate video-guided and face-to-face administrations.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified source factual.
Source locator: Results; Table 2; Supplement Table 1
Source numerical conflicts retained: not identified for this specific unit.
Report locations: P0134
^gait-b066-s01
gait-B066-S02
Original report claim: Both conditions occurred in a prepared university environment, with equipment supplied, marked distances, local Wi-Fi and nearby assistance.
Current scoped check: Both modes took place at UFS Car. Equipment was supplied, distances were taped, and local Wi-Fi was used. The remote examiner was in a separate soundproof room in the same building and close enough to help.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified source factual.
Source locator: Testing Procedures; Video-Based Assessment; Discussion limitations
Source numerical conflicts retained: not identified for this specific unit.
Report locations: P0134
^gait-b066-s02
gait-B066-S03
Original report claim: Participants were already familiar with the tests.
Current scoped check: Previous test experience is explicit. Measurements took place at the second endpoint of the parent trial.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified source factual.
Source locator: Discussion limitations
Source numerical conflicts retained: not identified for this specific unit.
Report locations: P0134
^gait-b066-s03
gait-B066-S04
Original report claim: Interrater and six-week intrarater analyses rescored the recorded performances.
Current scoped check: Interrater assessment used stored audio/video. Investigator 1 reviewed the same recordings after six weeks. Both investigators were blinded to initial scores.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified source factual.
Source locator: Testing Procedures
Source numerical conflicts retained: not identified for this specific unit.
Report locations: P0134
^gait-b066-s04
gait-B067-S01
Original report claim: The complete original HTML and supplement also reveal numerical inconsistencies.
Current scoped check: Source inconsistencies are confirmed: gait intrarater MDC is 0.19 m/s in Table 4 versus 0.97 m/s in prose. Official eligibility and technical-issue supplements were recovered separately. Current recovery does not independently certify what the report author examined previously.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified source conflict.
Source locator: 40-m Concurrent Validity results; Table 4; Reliability prose; Figure 2 D
Source numerical conflicts retained: yes.
Report locations: P0135
^gait-b067-s01
gait-B067-S02
Original report claim: For cross-method 40-m speed the text reports SEM 0.91 m/s and MDC 2.52 m/s alongside CV 4.70%; the figure's limits of agreement are approximately −0.40 to +0.28 m/s.
Current scoped check: The text prints SEM 0.91 m/s, CV 4.70% and MDC 2.52 m/s. Figure 2 D prints bias −0.06 m/s and limits −0.40 to +0.28 m/s. The report faithfully describes suspect source values. Do not silently repair them or use them as implementation thresholds.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified as reported source inconsistency.
Source locator: 40-Meter Fast-Paced Walk Test results; Figure 2 D, visually inspected
Source numerical conflicts retained: yes.
Report locations: P0135
^gait-b067-s02
gait-B067-S03
Original report claim: For same-video intrarater scoring, Table 4 reports MDC 0.19 m/s while the prose later gives 0.97.
Current scoped check: Table 4 gives intrarater MDC 0.19 m/s; later prose gives 0.97 m/s. SEM 0.07 × 1.96 × √2 ≈0.194 supports the table arithmetic, but does not establish the correct raw-data result.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified as reported source inconsistency.
Source locator: Table 4, 40-m row; Intrarater and Interrater Reliability paragraph
Source numerical conflicts retained: yes.
Report locations: P0135
^gait-b067-s03
gait-B067-S05
Original report claim: The useful result is feasibility of a tightly supported video workflow, with technical issues in 11/32 sessions; the suspect numerical thresholds should be withheld from implementation pending correction or raw-data verification. [9]
Current scoped check: Technical issues in 11 of 32 sessions are confirmed; 21 had none. Feasibility of a supported university workflow is an appropriate description. Withholding inconsistent thresholds is an appraisal judgment.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified factual components and supported interpretation.
Source locator: Video-Based Assessment; Discussion; Supplement Table 2
Source numerical conflicts retained: yes.
Report locations: P0135
^gait-b067-s05
gait-B082-R01
Original report claim: Aily 2024 [9] | Video-guided OARSI tasks/rescoring | Supported administration and scoring | Prepared site; numeric inconsistencies
Current scoped check: The 2024 OARSI video/face-to-face comparison and stored-video rescoring are confirmed. The prepared site and source numerical inconsistencies are confirmed. The qualified supported-workflow conclusion is appropriate.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified factual components and supported interpretation.
Source locator: Testing Procedures; Video-Based Assessment; Table 4; Figure 2
Source numerical conflicts retained: yes.
Report locations: P0154, P0155, P0156, P0157
^gait-b082-r01
gait-B124-R01
Original report claim: Aily JB 2024 [9]Cross-method comparison and video rescoring32 KL 2–3 participants; mean age 56; BMI below 30; 22 with bilateral pain | Prepared university setting; separate performances 30 minutes apart; recorded videos rescored six weeks later; Same day and later video rescoring | Small mean biases and high rescoring ICCs; technical issues in 11/32 sessions | Not home validation or six-week patient retest; original numeric inconsistencies; gait Figure 2 LoA −0.40 to +0.28 m/s
Current scoped check: All numerical components match: n=32; KL II–III; mean age 56.0 (SD 8.0); BMI <30 eligibility; 22 with bilateral pain; a prepared university site; a 30-minute break between assessments; six-week stored-video rescoring; high scorer IC Cs; 11/32 technical-issue sessions; gait limits −0.40 to +0.28 m/s. This was not home validation or six-week retesting of new patient performances. “30-minute break” is more precise than “performances 30 minutes apart”.
Previous audit status: partial source verification details unresolved. Current status: verified factual components and supported interpretation.
Source locator: Tables 2–4; Testing Procedures; Discussion; Supplement Tables 1–2; Figure 2 D
Source numerical conflicts retained: yes.
Report locations: P0309, P0310, P0311, P0312
^gait-b124-r01
Concurrent Validity and Reliability of Video-Based Approach to Assess Physical Function in Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis. · RPT-knee_oa_gait · RPT-knee_oa_sit_to_stand